Member-only story
Why You (Probably) Need Less Money to Retire Than You Think
The FIRE movement has shifted towards unreasonable riches, but it doesn’t have to be this way
Keith Weaver8 min read·1 hour ago--
I still remember when I first came across the FIRE community and checked out the top posts of the most popular forum themed around the movement. The titles of these posts went something like this:
“Can I retire with $600K? Here are my expenses”
“Low cost of living areas for early retirees looking for geoarbitrage”
“Side income ideas for semi-retired people with less than $30K in yearly revenue”
That being said, it’s rather hard to believe that this prior version of the FIRE movement and the one we have today are one and the same. Now, when you discuss FIRE numbers, it’s quite likely to hear figures upwards of $3M being cited as the “bare minimum.” Comfortable retirement, they claim, lays somewhere around the $5M mark. Well, I claim that this is complete and utter bogus.
Sure, in spite of my (intentional) disconnect from the modern world, I have not been living under a rock for these past few years. The rampant inflation that has taken us by surprise in the last couple of years has added great pressure to the budgets on which FIRE remains attainable.
