Written by Christina Comben, Staff Editor. Reviewed by Bryan O'Shea, Staff Editor. Written by Christina Comben, Staff Editor. Reviewed by Bryan O'Shea, Staff Editor. Bank of England reconsiders strict stablecoin regime
Latest NewsPublishedMay 14, 2026BoE weighs easing UK stablecoin caps and reserve demands after industry backlash, in a move that could decide whether GBP tokens can compete with dollar‑pegged rivals.
The Bank of England (BoE) is reconsidering parts of its proposed regime for pound sterling stablecoins after digital asset companies warned that holding caps and reserve requirements could stifle adoption and make UK-issued tokens uneconomic.
The central bank is looking at alternatives to temporary caps on how many stablecoins individuals and businesses can hold, and is examining whether its requirement that at least 40% of backing assets be held as non-interest-bearing deposits at the BoE is overly conservative, Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden told the Financial Times.
The rethink comes as the UK government and regulators try to position Britain as a competitive hub for digital assets while containing risks to bank funding and financial stability. Sterling-pegged tokens currently make up a tiny fraction of the roughly $300 billion global stablecoin market, which remains dominated by dollar-based issuers.
The BoE set out detailed ownership limits in its November 2025 consultation paper on a proposed regulatory regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins, building on options first aired in a 2023 discussion paper.
Under that proposal, individuals would be restricted to holding up to 20,000 pounds (roughly $27,000) of a given UK stablecoin, while businesses would be capped at roughly $13.5 million, at least during an initial transition period.
Stablecoins Discussion Paper, 2023. Source: Bank of England
The central bank argued that limits were needed to avoid a sudden outflow of deposits from commercial banks into new forms of “tokenised” money if a large stablecoin were rapidly adopted for payments.
Related: Bank of England chief says global stablecoin rules will ‘wrestle’ with US
Industry groups and prospective issuers countered that the caps were operationally cumbersome, hard to supervise across platforms, and could deter serious institutional use of regulated UK stablecoins in areas like corporate treasury, payroll and settlement.
BoE rethinks stablecoin caps after pushback
Breeden has been one of the most cautious voices on stablecoins within the BoE. In November 2025, she warned that diluting the rules too far could damage financial stability, stressing that stablecoins are money-like instruments that must be at least as safe and robust as existing payments infrastructure.
At the time, she backed stringent liquidity requirements that would force stablecoin issuers to park large portions of their reserves at the central bank and hold the rest in high-quality liquid securities such as UK government bonds.
Law firms and potential issuers argue that such a structure would significantly compress margins and make UK stablecoin issuance far less attractive than operating under the United States or European Union regimes.
UK hunts for middle ground on stablecoins
The shift in tone highlights how UK policymakers are still feeling their way toward a middle ground on stablecoins as global approaches diverge.
In January, UK lawmakers opened an inquiry into how best to oversee fiat-backed tokens, taking evidence from industry participants such as Coinbase and Innovate Finance, while the BoE and Treasury continue to refine a framework intended to sit alongside broader crypto rules and potential digital pound plans.
A more flexible approach to caps and backing requirements could determine whether systemic GBP stablecoins emerge as serious competitors to dollar-pegged rivals in cross-border payments and onshore crypto markets, or whether activity remains concentrated in jurisdictions seen as more accommodating.
Magazine: Singapore isn’t a ‘crypto hub’ — it’s something better: StraitsX CEO
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.More on the subject
Law firm Fenwick & West sued for $525M over alleged role in FTX collapse1 hour agoAmin Haqshanas
CFTC no-action letter eases event contract reporting rules2 hours agoZoltan Vardai
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong gets behind CLARITY Act ahead of Thursday markup15 hours agoVince QuillLaw firm Fenwick & West sued for $525M over alleged role in FTX collapse1 hour agoAmin HaqshanasCFTC no-action letter eases event contract reporting rules2 hours agoZoltan VardaiCoinbase CEO Brian Armstrong gets behind CLARITY Act ahead of Thursday markup15 hours agoVince Quill