Namik Muduroglu: Token economics incentivize selling over holding, why current solutions like lockups are inadequate, and the urgent need for effective DAO governance | Unchained

Crypto's token model flaws hinder long-term growth, sparking calls for governance and incentive reforms.

Listen on Unchained

Share

Add us on Google by Editorial Team | Powered by Gloria Mar. 3, 2026

Key Takeaways

• Token economics often incentivize selling rather than holding, leading to structural issues.
• Current solutions like lockups and buybacks are insufficient for aligning incentives.
• Founders and investors often benefit disproportionately from the current token model.
• Insiders have hindered the adoption of revenue-based models by benefiting from the status quo.
• The shift from investment to trade in crypto has weakened incentives to hold tokens.
• Creating incentives for long-term holding is crucial for token stability.
• DAOs have struggled with governance effectiveness, prompting a shift towards traditional equity models.
• Token overhang can deter institutional investment, affecting liquidity and pricing.
• Locking allocations can help startups grow into their valuations over time.
• The notion that crypto projects can operate without responsibility is flawed.
• Effective governance structures are needed to improve the performance of DAOs.
• Market dynamics in crypto require a reevaluation of token value and utility.

Guest intro

Namik Muduroglu serves as Chief Strategy Officer and founding team member at MegaETH Labs. He previously worked as a Strategic Business Developer at Consensys. At MegaETH, he shaped the project’s launch strategy, including its oversubscribed token sale that raised $10 million in three minutes.

Structural issues in token economics

• Most tokens are structurally broken because they incentivize selling rather than holding.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• The design flaw in tokens creates a “race to the exit” mentality among investors.
• Current token mechanisms like lockups and buybacks are viewed as temporary fixes.

• Current solutions like lockups and buybacks are merely band-aid fixes.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• The misalignment of incentives is a fundamental problem needing deeper solutions.
• Token models often benefit founders and investors more than other stakeholders.

• The current token model is broken due to founders and investors benefiting disproportionately.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• The disparity between token value and utility is a critical flaw in the model.

The impact of trading behavior on token value

• The transition from investment to trade has altered token economics significantly.

• The shift from investment to trade in crypto has broken structural incentives for holding tokens.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• Short-term trading incentives undermine long-term holding strategies.
• Creating incentives for holding tokens is essential for market stability.

• Incentives must be created for people to hold tokens, or else they will continue to trade them short-term.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• The current market behavior affects how tokens are valued and perceived.
• Long-term holding incentives are lacking in many current token designs.
• The change in market dynamics requires a reevaluation of token strategies.

Governance challenges in DAOs

• DAOs have not proven effective in governance, leading to calls for traditional models.

• The current governance structures in DAOs have not proven effective.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• The limitations of DAOs highlight the need for more robust governance solutions.
• Traditional equity models on the blockchain are gaining traction as alternatives.
• The effectiveness of DAOs in governance is a significant concern in the crypto space.
• The shift towards traditional models suggests a reevaluation of DAO structures.
• Governance challenges in DAOs impact their overall performance and adoption.
• The need for effective governance is critical for the success of decentralized projects.

Token overhang and its effects on investment

• Token overhang can deter smart money from investing in crypto projects.

• The structural overhang of tokens can deter smart money from investing.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• Market liquidity and pricing are affected by the presence of token overhang.
• Institutional investors are cautious about investing in tokens with structural issues.
• The opacity in pricing due to token overhang is a barrier for investors.
• Addressing token overhang is essential for attracting institutional investment.
• The challenges in market dynamics require strategic solutions to improve liquidity.
• Token overhang is a critical issue in the current crypto investment landscape.

The role of lockups in startup growth

• Locking up allocations can help startups grow into their valuations over time.

• Locking up allocations can be beneficial for startups to grow into their valuations.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• Lockups provide stability and time for startups to develop their value.
• The strategy of locking allocations is crucial for long-term growth in crypto.
• Lockups can prevent premature selling and ensure better market stability.
• The approach of locking allocations aligns with long-term growth strategies.
• Startups benefit from lockups by having the opportunity to mature in the market.
• The use of lockups is a strategic decision for sustaining startup growth.

Accountability in crypto projects

• The idea that crypto projects can operate without responsibility is flawed.

• The idea that crypto projects can operate without responsibility is nonsensical.

  — Namik Muduroglu

• Accountability is essential for the credibility and success of crypto projects.
• The mindset of operating without responsibility is prevalent in the crypto community.
• Emphasizing accountability can lead to more sustainable project development.
• The need for responsibility in crypto projects is critical for their long-term success.
• Addressing the lack of accountability is necessary for improving project outcomes.
• The critique of the current mindset highlights the importance of responsible development.

The need for effective governance structures

• Effective governance structures are needed to improve DAO performance.
• The limitations of current governance models necessitate new approaches.
• Governance effectiveness is crucial for the success of decentralized initiatives.
• The development of robust governance structures is a priority in the crypto space.
• Improving governance can enhance the overall performance of DAOs.
• The challenges in governance highlight the need for innovative solutions.
• Effective governance structures are essential for the credibility of decentralized projects.
• The focus on governance is critical for the future of decentralized finance.