Firas Modad: The political system is rigged by corporate interests, Iran’s nuclear concessions reshape negotiations, and Israel’s strategy aims for regional dysfunction | The Peter McCormack Show

Iran's uranium reduction and missile focus shift Middle East power dynamics, impacting global energy markets.

Listen on The Peter McCormack Show

Share

Add us on Google by Editorial Team Mar. 25, 2026

Key takeaways

• Political decision-making is often controlled by a small group of shareholders, not elected officials.
• Iran has significantly reduced its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, aligning with nuclear negotiation concessions.
• Israel’s primary concern with Iran is its ballistic missile capabilities, not just nuclear issues.
• Israel perceives the Iranian regime as an existential threat and aims to weaken regional adversaries.
• Israel prefers to be surrounded by weak, dysfunctional states to minimize threats.
• Historical use of radical Sunni groups against enemies has led to domestic repercussions.
• Engaging in Middle Eastern conflicts could destabilize the region and increase terrorism risks.
• Political leaders often promise restrained foreign policies but follow aggressive strategies.
• Influential donors and political connections drive US foreign policy decisions.
• The ongoing conflict could potentially destabilize the current energy system.
• Iran’s actions in the energy sector could have severe repercussions on global markets.
• The cyclical nature of using radical groups in warfare highlights repeated geopolitical strategies.
• There is a systemic issue in governance where corporate interests intersect with politics.
• The geopolitical landscape is heavily influenced by military capabilities and strategic threats.
• Foreign intervention in the Middle East has significant implications for national security.

Guest intro

Firas Modad is founder of Modad Geopolitics and a Middle East political and security analyst serving clients in security, finance, insurance, media, and investment. He specializes in regional conflicts including the Iran-Turkey-Saudi rivalry, US-led versus Chinese-Russian geopolitical confrontations, and the economic impacts of Middle East wars on energy markets and global trade.

The rigged political system

• The political system is fundamentally rigged, with decision-making controlled by a small group of shareholders rather than elected officials.

  — Firas Modad

• Politicians are often not the true decision-makers; instead, major shareholders in defense contracting exert significant influence.

• The politicians are not the decision makers and they’re not the beneficiaries… the system is fundamentally rigged… this is an oligarchy.

  — Firas Modad

• Understanding the intersection of politics and corporate interests is crucial for grasping governance issues.
• The influence of major shareholders highlights systemic issues in political accountability.
• This dynamic creates a disconnect between public expectations and actual policy decisions.
• The oligarchic nature of the system undermines democratic principles.
• A critical examination of political influence is necessary for meaningful reform.

Iran’s nuclear concessions

• Iran has made significant concessions regarding its nuclear program.

• The Iranians had conceded on every major point when it comes to the nuclear issue including getting rid of their highly enriched uranium stockpile 60% so well below what’s needed for a modern nuclear weapon which is 90%.

  — Firas Modad

• The reduction of enriched uranium stockpile is a key point in nuclear negotiations.
• Understanding uranium enrichment levels is essential for assessing nuclear capabilities.
• These concessions are critical to the dynamics of international negotiations.
• Iran’s actions reflect a willingness to engage diplomatically on nuclear issues.
• The focus remains on ensuring compliance with international nuclear agreements.
• The geopolitical implications of these concessions extend beyond nuclear capabilities.

Israel’s strategic posture

• Israel views the Iranian regime as an existential threat.

• Israel considers the Iranian regime an existential threat to Israel.

  — Firas Modad

• Israel aims to weaken potential regional adversaries for security reasons.

• Israel wants to be surrounded by failed states essentially or poor dysfunctional states.

  — Firas Modad

• Israel’s strategy involves maintaining regional stability through military and diplomatic means.
• The perception of existential threats shapes Israel’s foreign policy objectives.
• Israel’s preference for weak neighboring states minimizes potential threats.
• Understanding Israel’s security strategy is key to analyzing Middle Eastern geopolitics.

The use of radical Sunni groups

• Historical precedence exists for using radical Sunni groups against enemies.

• The Syrian jihadis have been moved to Iraq and they’re probably going to be used against Iran and its allies again.

  — Firas Modad

• This strategy has led to domestic repercussions in the past.
• The cyclical nature of using radical groups highlights repeated geopolitical strategies.
• Understanding the historical context of US involvement in the Middle East is crucial.
• The use of radical groups often results in unintended consequences.
• This approach reflects a pattern of foreign intervention with complex outcomes.
• The implications of this strategy extend to regional stability and security.

Risks of Middle Eastern conflicts

• Engaging in another Middle Eastern conflict could destabilize the region.

• Why are we getting sucked into another conflict in the Middle East which could destabilize the region again and bring immigrants and terrorism back to our shores?

  — Firas Modad

• Such conflicts increase the risk of terrorism returning to Western shores.
• The potential for regional destabilization has significant global implications.
• Understanding US foreign policy is key to assessing these risks.
• The consequences of foreign intervention resonate with national security concerns.
• The cyclical nature of political promises versus actions in foreign policy is evident.
• A critical perspective on foreign intervention highlights potential repercussions.

Influences on US foreign policy

• Political leaders often promise restrained foreign policies but follow aggressive strategies.

• Everybody promises the same exact thing and then everybody implements the same exact playbook.

  — Firas Modad

• A network of influential donors drives US foreign policy decisions.

• You figure out that this group of donors is actually in control of elected officials.

  — Firas Modad

• The relationship between political figures and financial backers influences policy.
• This dynamic highlights the power of financial interests in shaping foreign policy.
• Understanding these influences is crucial for analyzing political accountability.
• The cyclical nature of political rhetoric and actions is a recurring theme.

Energy system repercussions

• The ongoing conflict could lead to a breakdown of the current energy system.

• If the Iranians go all out against energy which they haven’t done yet the repercussions of this war will break the system as we know it.

  — Firas Modad

• Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East impact global energy markets.
• The potential destabilization of energy systems has significant economic implications.
• Understanding these repercussions is crucial for assessing global market stability.
• Iran’s actions in the energy sector could have severe global consequences.
• The interconnectedness of energy markets highlights the importance of geopolitical stability.
• The prediction of energy system breakdown underscores the stakes of ongoing conflicts.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.