Federal Reserve tells Congress it wants technology-neutral rules for tokenized securities and stablecoins

Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman laid out a modernization agenda that includes digital asset regulation, AI oversight, and the first CAMELS rating overhaul since 1979.

Share

Add us on Google by Editorial Team Jun. 3, 2026

The Federal Reserve’s top banking regulator just told Congress something the crypto industry has been waiting years to hear: tokenized securities should get the same capital treatment as their traditional counterparts, and stablecoin issuers need a clear regulatory path forward.

Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman delivered testimony before the House Financial Services Committee on June 4, covering everything from community bank relief to artificial intelligence. But the sections on digital assets carried the most weight for anyone watching the intersection of traditional finance and crypto.

What Bowman actually said about digital assets

Bowman’s core argument on tokenized securities is deceptively simple. If a Treasury bond gets tokenized and put on a blockchain, it’s still a Treasury bond. The capital requirements shouldn’t change just because the delivery mechanism did. In English: the Fed doesn’t want to penalize banks for using newer technology to hold the same underlying assets.

On stablecoins, Bowman signaled the Fed is actively developing a regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers as part of the broader GENIUS Act. The legislation has been working its way through Congress, and having the Fed explicitly say it’s building out the supervisory architecture gives the effort institutional credibility that previous stablecoin proposals lacked.

Advertisement

The broader banking picture

Bowman characterized the banking sector as “sound and resilient,” pointing to strong capital ratios, healthy liquidity buffers, and overall profitability. Lending growth remains positive, and delinquency rates are at historical levels, suggesting the system isn’t under acute stress.

But she also flagged a trend that’s been building for years: non-bank financial institutions are eating into traditional banking’s market share. Mortgage origination is one area where this shift has been particularly noticeable.

The Community Bank Leverage Ratio was finalized at 8% with a four-quarter grace period for compliance. The Fed also issued proposals in March 2026 to modernize the US regulatory capital framework more broadly.

A supervision system that hasn’t been updated since disco

Perhaps the most telling detail from Bowman’s testimony: the CAMELS rating system, which regulators use to assess bank health, hasn’t been meaningfully updated since 1979. For context, that predates the internet, mobile banking, and the entire concept of digital assets.

CAMELS stands for Capital adequacy, Asset quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, and Sensitivity to market risk. It’s the report card every bank gets from its regulators.

Bowman also highlighted updates to the Matters Requiring Attention framework, which is the formal mechanism supervisors use to flag problems at individual banks. The MRA process has been criticized for inconsistency and opacity, and the proposed reforms aim to make it more predictable and transparent.

What this means for investors and crypto markets

Bowman was confirmed as Vice Chair for Supervision in June 2025, succeeding Michael Barr. The shift in tone under Bowman has been consistent since her appointment: less prescriptive, more principles-based, and explicitly open to innovation.

For the tokenized securities market, technology-neutral capital treatment would remove one of the biggest barriers to bank participation. Right now, many banks that want to custody or trade tokenized assets face uncertainty about how regulators will treat those positions for capital purposes.

The capital framework proposals from March 2026 still need to be finalized. The CAMELS overhaul is still in the proposal stage. And the GENIUS Act still needs to clear Congress.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.