Alex Thorn: Traditional banks are innovating on crypto rails, institutional investment is reshaping finance, and the clarity act faces significant political hurdles | The Wolf Of All Streets

Traditional banks innovate on crypto rails while lobbying against regulatory clarity, reshaping financial landscapes.

Listen on The Wolf Of All Streets

Share

Add us on Google by Editorial Team Apr. 10, 2026

Key Takeaways

• Traditional banks are innovating on crypto rails while trying to manage disruption from new entrants.
• There’s a significant disconnect between institutional investment in crypto and the disillusionment of retail investors.
• Banks are building crypto infrastructure while their lobbyists obstruct regulatory clarity.
• The clarity act has a very low chance of passing due to ongoing political disagreements.
• If a coherent deal isn’t reached by April, the blockchain regulatory clarity act may not pass.
• The clarity act could potentially serve as a trojan horse for the banking industry.
• The clarity act includes the greatest expansion of the Patriot Act’s financial surveillance powers since 2001.
• Crypto is likely to receive regulatory clarity and support from the current administration.
• Current political dynamics make it challenging to codify clarity in crypto regulation.
• Banks need the clarity act more than the crypto industry does.
• Institutional adoption of crypto technologies is reshaping the financial landscape.
• The evolving dynamics between Wall Street and blockchain are complex and multifaceted.
• AI and digital scarcity are becoming increasingly relevant in the digital economy.
• The future of finance is being transformed by the potential of crypto.
• Regulatory clarity is crucial for the continued growth and adoption of crypto technologies.

Guest intro

Alex Thorn is Head of Firmwide Research at Galaxy Digital. Prior to joining Galaxy, he spent 12 years at Fidelity Investments, most recently co-managing Avon Ventures, the early-stage crypto venture fund affiliated with FMR LLC. There, he also served as Director of Blockchain Research at Fidelity Center for Applied Technology.

The strategic tension in banking and crypto innovation

• The biggest banks are innovating on crypto rails while simultaneously trying to slow down the disruption from new entrants.

  — Alex Thorn

• Banks face the innovator’s dilemma, needing to innovate faster than disruptors can dislodge them.

• They face the innovator’s dilemma here where they have to innovate faster than the disruptors can dislodge them… it’s like actually a smart strategy if it is their strategy.

  — Alex Thorn

• Understanding the dynamics between traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto technologies is crucial.
• The strategic tension within the banking sector involves navigating innovation and disruption.
• Banks are adopting crypto technologies while managing the risks of new market entrants.
• The dual approach of innovation and obstruction reflects banks’ strategic positioning.

• It’s starting to look to me like it’s actually a more coherent strategy of delay block give them more time to build right.

  — Alex Thorn

Institutional versus retail investment dynamics

• There is a significant disconnect between institutional investment in crypto and the disillusionment of retail investors.

  — Alex Thorn

• Institutions are heavily investing in crypto while retail investors are disillusioned.

• There’s a huge delta between institutions and retail… every big bank and brokerage is doing a bunch right… meanwhile, retail is hurting and disillusioned.

  — Alex Thorn

• The contrasting behaviors of different investor classes highlight market sentiment.
• Institutional investment in crypto is reshaping the financial landscape.
• Retail investors face challenges amidst institutional adoption of crypto technologies.
• The disconnect between institutional and retail investors reflects broader market trends.
• Understanding current market sentiment is essential for navigating the crypto space.

Regulatory challenges and the clarity act

• The clarity act has a 0% chance of passing due to ongoing delays and political disagreements.

  — Alex Thorn

• Political disagreements are hindering the passage of the clarity act.
• The clarity act faces significant legislative challenges.

• I’ve been dangling way out on the smallest limb by my feet saying clarity has basically 0% chance of passing at this point.

  — Alex Thorn

• The clarity act’s potential passage is uncertain due to political dynamics.
• Regulatory challenges are impacting the adoption of crypto technologies.
• The clarity act’s fate is tied to broader political and legislative processes.
• Understanding the legislative process is crucial for anticipating regulatory changes.

The potential impact of the clarity act

• The clarity act may serve as a trojan horse for the banking industry, despite potential optimism about its passage.

  — Alex Thorn

• Concerns exist about the clarity act’s potential negative consequences for the crypto space.
• The clarity act could expand the Patriot Act’s financial surveillance powers.

• Clarity includes like the single greatest expansion of the patriot act’s financial surveillance power since 2001 just to be aware people should be aware of that that’s a fact.

  — Alex Thorn

• The clarity act’s implications for financial surveillance are significant.
• The clarity act could reshape the regulatory landscape for crypto technologies.
• Understanding the clarity act’s potential impact is essential for stakeholders in the crypto space.
• The clarity act’s passage could have far-reaching consequences for the banking industry.

Political dynamics and crypto regulation

• The current political dynamics make it challenging to codify clarity in crypto regulation.

  — Alex Thorn

• Political realities are impacting the legislative process for crypto regulation.

• You’re dealing with the political reality of the current senate breakdown… Republicans probably need like nine Democrats to vote yes on this to even advance it to the floor.

  — Alex Thorn

• The current Senate composition poses challenges for passing crypto legislation.
• Political constraints are hindering efforts to achieve regulatory clarity.
• The political landscape is shaping the future of crypto regulation.
• Understanding the political dynamics is crucial for navigating the regulatory environment.
• The current administration’s stance on crypto regulation is influencing legislative outcomes.

The role of banks in crypto adoption

• Banks need the clarity act more than the crypto industry does.

  — Alex Thorn

• Banks require regulatory clarity to operate effectively in the blockchain space.

• Giancarlo told me in his opinion that the banks need the clarity act more than the crypto industry does because they’re banks and they literally need the clarity on how they can use this technology assets and move forward even for building their own businesses on the blockchain side.

  — Alex Thorn

• The banking industry’s need for clarity is critical for their blockchain operations.
• Banks are key players in the adoption of crypto technologies.
• The clarity act is essential for banks’ strategic positioning in the crypto space.
• Understanding banks’ role in crypto adoption is crucial for stakeholders.
• The clarity act’s passage could significantly impact banks’ operations in the blockchain industry.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.