A study and analytical article entitled: Exporting Internal Inflation Abroad Using Tariffs: A Brilliant Policy in Need of Analysis. 🦋
--
Enjoy
There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of studies on the nature of tariffs, their causes, and their positive and negative effects. But what I will present now is slightly different. There is one country on Earth that deserves a special definition and specific laws regarding tariffs, unlike all other economies in the world. America does not use tariffs simply to raise money by imposing duties on goods or products in general, nor as a weapon to achieve economic or political interests, or to force economies dependent on the American economy to export their products. Rather, it is, in fact, a very clever mechanism for exporting inflation from the American economy to all countries of the world.
When I raise tariffs by 15% on the rest of the world, it often seems that the American consumer will bear the cost, leading to higher prices. On the surface, I know that the producer won’t shoulder this increase. But in reality, it’s synonymous with a decrease in the purchasing power of the $100 bill. Instead of America trying to curb inflation through its usual mechanisms, such as raising interest rates — where people deposit money seeking the promised interest, thus withdrawing large amounts of cash from the market to control inflation, which then results in paying interest to depositors later
Instead, the most ingenious idea is this: when I raise tariffs by 15%, it means that a consumer who owns, say, a $100 bill now owns a bill with less purchasing power. Instead of trying to curb inflation domestically and later paying depositors interest if I raise interest rates, I’ve built a new mechanism that ensures the flow of money into the treasury from abroad — from the rest of the world to which I’ve exported inflation under the guise of tariffs. This guarantees numerous gains, which I consider the result of the smartest economic move I’ve seen in any American administration. Now, I’ll list these results.
As a nation, I floated the dollar and immediately reduced its value without any intervention, which yielded numerous benefits.
First, I reduced the real value of the debt and the real value of the interest accrued on that debt instantly.
Second, as a nation with outstanding obligations in the form of US Treasury bonds, I reduced their real value, or its equivalent, as if I had printed billions to repay the maturing bonds, but without actually printing a single piece of paper.
Third, by reducing the purchasing power of the dollar, which effectively devalued it by 15%, I saved a significant amount of money that would otherwise have been spent on salaries for employees, soldiers, retirees, and so on.
Fourth, I implemented a mechanism that brought billions into my treasury by forcing countries worldwide to pay me 15% of their export volume, since I imposed a 15% tax on all my imports. The majority of this 15% is borne by the American consumer, with a small portion going to the producer. In short,
I used the global economy to extract billions from the American consumer without them understanding anything.
Fifth, I expanded my political influence and dominance over countries around the world that didn’t understand anything. And I set new prices for their products.
(Explain)
Tariffs redefine the relationship between price and value. For example, if a mobile phone sold for $100 before the tariff and now sells for $130 after, the nominal price ($130) is not a real increase, but rather a reflection of the decreased purchasing power of the dollar ($100 is no longer worth what it once was). Therefore, the American consumer pays the price through the decrease in the value of their money, not through a real increase in the price of the goods. This is a crucial distinction between nominal and real variables, and it is central to monetary analysis.
I describe the process as follows the American consumer bears the cost of the tariff, but this cost does not appear as traditional inflation (a rise in prices due to an increase in the money supply), but rather as a loss of purchasing power resulting from higher import prices. From an accounting perspective, the result is the same: the consumer buys less for the same amount of money. But politically, the difference is significant: the government does not raise interest rates (which causes recession and costs it interest on its debts), nor does it print money outright (which causes runaway inflation), but rather uses tariffs as a “hidden import tax” that reduces the real value of money in the hands of citizens.
*****
Here, some economists might have reservations. From a traditional economic perspective, a decrease in the dollar’s purchasing power without an increase in the money supply implies a negative supply shock (the availability of goods decreases or they become relatively more expensive). Tariffs create this shock: imported goods become more expensive, reducing the supply of cheaper goods, which in turn lowers the purchasing power of money. The crucial difference is that you don’t need a central bank printing money — tariffs alone create “imported inflation” that remains within the US and isn’t exported. This seems to contradict your idea’s title, “exporting inflation,” because the impact falls primarily on the American consumer.
@My answers. will be.
This is true from a purely mathematical and economic perspective. But if you are a country with a population possessing a consumerist culture and mentality — a culture built over decades — then a 10% price increase for a product won’t cause a societal shock that would change their habits. On the contrary, it will force producers and other countries to fill their coffers, compelling consumers to start depleting their savings at best. At worst, it will create a reality where they can’t accumulate the remaining money from their salaries to increase their savings. It will also push those without savings to borrow from banks. This will further stimulate the economic cycle, leading to higher taxes and more cash withdrawn from the market. Furthermore, it will eliminate the need to pay interest later, as is traditionally the case when interest rates are raised. People will then be incentivized to deposit money, promising future returns, thus curbing inflation. When the purchasing power of the currency decreases, my $38 trillion debt instantly loses 10–15% in value, and the interest payments on that debt become less costly for me. The cost of servicing US Treasury bonds also decreases. Furthermore, my national obligations — salaries, pensions, and military pay — also lose their real value without me printing a single dollar.
That’s why I said America. It’s an exception to the traditional definition and deserves a definition specific to it, namely, the nature of tariffs. It’s the world’s largest economy. Its currency, the dollar, is the currency used daily by every country in the world in their transactions. More importantly, its debt is denominated in dollars. So, any devaluation of its currency without printing new money immediately reduces the real value of its public debt and the real value of the interest owed on that debt. This, of course, encourages American companies to relocate manufacturing to America, stimulates exports, and supports domestic industries. Ultimately, American society is fiercely consumerist, unlike Japanese or Chinese society in any way, and this can be summed up by the phrase, “All you can take.” 😊
And here, at this point, which is the most important in the entire article, is the question: what is the purpose of all this? And why would a country like America pursue such a policy?
In 1933, US President Roosevelt signed a law making it a criminal offence for anyone to possess gold, punishable by 10 years’ imprisonment, after asking people to hand over their gold to the state in exchange for approximately $20 per ounce. The aim of all this was to provide a cover for printing more money, but as soon as the gold of ordinary citizens was transferred to the state’s vaults, the price of gold rose to $35 an ounce, thereby enabling the state to make a 70% profit, whilst the people lost 40% of their wealth. The incident has been repeated in our own time through what are known as customs tariffs. But wordplay is a hallmark of this era. And the seizure of a large share of ordinary people’s wealth through this ingenious economic tactic.
The aim of American economists and the current administration is not to hoard money in the state coffers using this tactic, which I have called ‘exporting inflation abroad’. Rather, their real aim is to buy time. What I mean by this is that there is a trend within the new administration towards delaying the onset of the Great Depression and the collapse of the US economy — in other words, a gradual international recession and contraction, leading to a British-style model. I believe the US economy has entered its final stages. They have finally realised that the only solution is for the US economy to acquire new assets. This explains what happened in Venezuela due to its natural resources, where oil fields are considered assets. What is happening in Iran has several objectives, including raising global oil prices and attempting to control Iran’s oil assets and incorporate them into the US economy. Greenland. Cuba. Trump’s attempt to annex Canada. Any asset — an airport, a port, an oil field — that the US economy seizes pushes it a few steps further from the brink of collapse.
And this is the form the United States of America has now taken, which flies in the face of the fundamental principles upon which it was founded, of liberalism and the free market, and resembles the Nazi model in its final stages, with its policy of ‘escaping forward’ — which is simply the use of military force to invade other countries and seize their assets and wealth, such as gold. But the problem with this model is that it traps you in a vicious circle, because there is a direct correlation between the assets you seize from others and military spending. The more new resources and assets you control, the more new wars you find yourself embroiled in. You will see that your military spending has doubled and become even more brutal. You remain in this vicious circle until your expenditure exceeds your revenue. Then everything collapses. Nevertheless, America, as a nation, is an exception to the rest of the world’s countries, for several reasons.
- Its currency, the dollar, is the backbone of the monetary system and daily transactions in buying and selling.
- 2. America has managed to entangle all the countries of the world in debt bonds.
- 3. Its debts are denominated in dollars, so if the dollar’s value falls, the value of the debt falls.
Nevertheless, I believe I have observed economic patterns upon which the system is built. At first glance, these may appear to be flaws in the system. But if you study these patterns, you will find that the system was designed in this way and with this mechanism, and that it is a deliberate construct. I am talking about the start of a new economic cycle. And the shift of financial gravity to the region or continent that will dominate during the new cycle, which occurs approximately every 130 — 150 years. This empire collapses once the successor is ready. Just as happened with the British Empire. So the centre of financial gravity shifted from Britain to the United States of America. It seems that this cycle is nearing its end. And if we look closely, we will see that the technology that has moved to China over the past 50 years was not random, and that over the past 20 years China has built a miniature model of what life will be like in the new system of the new cycle.
The Great Reset
The debt-burdened global economy reached a breaking point at this peak in 2026. The debt bubble had reached its zenith in Japan, America, France and Italy. The new system of the coming modernisation began to take shape and crystallise, particularly with the rise of Brexit. Technology has been deliberately transferred to China. Most production plants have been relocated to China. It appears that the economic centre of gravity in the coming cycle will shift to Asia, following America. By the end of this cycle, I do not mean that America will cease to exist, but rather that it will adopt the British model and its global role will erode.
I will outline a few steps to explain the nature of the new economic system.
1- Cash will be abolished and money will shift from paper to electronic currencies held by banks. In this way, control over people will increase further and further.
2 — There will be an electronic ID for everyone.
3- Most people will lose their private property. For example, if you want a car, you will rent it from a car company. There will be something akin to an electronic fingerprint and a social points system.
Even the use of social media will be documented. via the digital ID
4. Artificial intelligence will govern and regulate daily life. The new currencies will be backed by gold, which is why Russia and China have purchased record amounts of gold over the last 10 years. They will adopt the blockchain system.
And I can say this now. Welcome to a system in which your health passport, your social credit score, your digital ID, your electronic fingerprint and your financial rating are all electronically linked, determining your identity and dictating where you are permitted to go. Just like the system built in China over the last 20 years, As a testing ground. for over a billion and a half people, although I believe China does not actually have that many inhabitants — perhaps we will expand on this in a future article. China has built a complex system of cameras that recognise faces and assess people socially and behaviourally. It has put the infrastructure in place for this. And this is the scripted scenario we are heading towards.
How will this happen?
There must be an event that threatens. security on a global scale. Humanity will then submit to whatever new conditions are imposed upon it. None of these conditions can be imposed on societies in a state of stability. So a major event is coming that will allow the system to lock humanity into a cage
There are a few points I’d like to mention. Perhaps those who read this will gain a clearer picture of our current reality. There are facts and information that have been before us for years, specifically concerning gold. Perhaps in the future, we’ll become more aware and pay attention to details like these.
The Fort Knox mystery. It is a gold vault containing 4,500 tonnes of gold. The strange thing is that the last physical audit was in 1953. In other words, the gold is physically present there only on paper.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland. It is the BIS that holds the real power and manages the central banks’ gold lending operations. It could be called. the ‘shadow market’
in this system. The physical gold never moves from its location, yet its ownership changes thousands of times a minute through online buying and selling.
There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of paper ounces traded every minute. In exchange for a single real, physical ounce.
The system relies on the assumption that people will not all turn up on the same day to claim their gold. If this were to happen, everything would collapse completely.
Most countries around the world, such as the Netherlands, Poland and even France, announced yesterday, 8 April 2026, that they had completed the transfer of their final batch of gold from New York to their own territories. They are aware that when the Great Reset occurs, paper money will become worthless. The only thing of value that will survive will be gold. Silver and other rare metals.
My advice to you is to keep some physical gold in reserve. Because of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the massive rise in energy prices, countries are now increasingly heading towards fiscal deficits. Many countries will be forced to sell part of their gold reserves 1. Its currency, the dollar, is the backbone of the monetary system and daily transactions in buying and selling.
2. America has managed to entangle all the countries of the world in debt bonds.
3. Its debts are denominated in dollars, so if the dollar’s value falls, the value of the debt falls.
Nevertheless, I believe I have observed economic patterns upon which the system is built. At first glance, these may appear to be flaws in the system. But if you study these patterns, you will find that the system was designed in this way and with this mechanism, and that it is a deliberate construct. I am talking about the start of a new economic cycle. And the shift of financial gravity to the region or continent that will dominate during the new cycle, which occurs approximately every 130 — 150 years. This empire collapses once the successor is ready. Just as happened with the British Empire. So the centre of financial gravity shifted from Britain to the United States of America. It seems that this cycle is nearing its end. And if we look closely, we will see that the technology that has moved to China over the past 50 years was not random, and that over the past 20 years China has built a miniature model of what life will be like in the new system of the new cycle.
The Great Reset
The debt-burdened global economy reached a breaking point at this peak in 2026. The debt bubble had reached its zenith in Japan, America, France and Italy. The new system of the coming modernisation began to take shape and crystallise, particularly with the rise of Brexit. Technology has been deliberately transferred to China. Most production plants have been relocated to China. It appears that the economic centre of gravity in the coming cycle will shift to Asia, following America. By the end of this cycle, I do not mean that America will cease to exist, but rather that it will adopt the British model and its global role will erode.
I will outline a few steps to explain the nature of the new economic system.
1- Cash will be abolished and money will shift from paper to electronic currencies held by banks. In this way, control over people will increase further and further.
2 — There will be an electronic ID for everyone.
3- Most people will lose their private property. For example, if you want a car, you will rent it from a car company. There will be something akin to an electronic fingerprint and a social points system.
Even the use of social media will be documented. via the digital ID
🦋
